<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EPN ACRU Changes and You</title>
	<link>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/</link>
	<description>Money Saving Reviews &#124; Money Saving Buying Guides</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jfc</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4607</link>
		<dc:creator>jfc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4607</guid>
		<description>Hi Bunn,

It's unclear at this point exactly how these changes will affect things but it has created a lot of worry about where eBay is headed with this and exactly what they mean about the traffic you send being 'engaged' with eBay.

I suspect it's their form of "smart pricing" for low quality traffic but instead of dropping earnings they kick out the affiliate, apparently permanently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bunn,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s unclear at this point exactly how these changes will affect things but it has created a lot of worry about where eBay is headed with this and exactly what they mean about the traffic you send being &#8216;engaged&#8217; with eBay.</p>
<p>I suspect it&#8217;s their form of &#8220;smart pricing&#8221; for low quality traffic but instead of dropping earnings they kick out the affiliate, apparently permanently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bunn Coffee Makers</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4604</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunn Coffee Makers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4604</guid>
		<description>Judging from the buzz on several forums over the last day or so, ACRU changes are the least of our problems. Several people report that they've been dropped from the EPN program completely.

It seems very hard to discern a pattern as to who's getting dumped ... both big &#38; small producers seem to have gotten the bad news email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging from the buzz on several forums over the last day or so, ACRU changes are the least of our problems. Several people report that they&#8217;ve been dropped from the EPN program completely.</p>
<p>It seems very hard to discern a pattern as to who&#8217;s getting dumped &#8230; both big &amp; small producers seem to have gotten the bad news email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4340</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 06:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4340</guid>
		<description>I love the BANS idea, but could not afford the price tag.  I developed a way to create niche sites using Joomla which is a free software that installs through your cpanel.  Check out my video:  http://JoomNiche.com

And it avoids you making the mistake of leaving the BANS footprint everywhere which could get you penalized by Google.

Thanks for the good info about the new EPN guidelines..  Going to have to re-think the cheap stuff I'm pushing..??

-Corey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the BANS idea, but could not afford the price tag.  I developed a way to create niche sites using Joomla which is a free software that installs through your cpanel.  Check out my video:  <a href="http://JoomNiche.com" rel="nofollow">http://JoomNiche.com</a></p>
<p>And it avoids you making the mistake of leaving the BANS footprint everywhere which could get you penalized by Google.</p>
<p>Thanks for the good info about the new EPN guidelines..  Going to have to re-think the cheap stuff I&#8217;m pushing..??</p>
<p>-Corey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luxury Paris Hotels</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4314</link>
		<dc:creator>Luxury Paris Hotels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 12:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4314</guid>
		<description>Not for everything - with the requirement to use Paypal or COD ONLY for eBay they tried it first in Australia - doesn't look like its going to work though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not for everything - with the requirement to use Paypal or COD ONLY for eBay they tried it first in Australia - doesn&#8217;t look like its going to work though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The best quotes</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4247</link>
		<dc:creator>The best quotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4247</guid>
		<description>I think eBay is doing everything to get more users, it is a beneficial technique</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think eBay is doing everything to get more users, it is a beneficial technique</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfc</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4242</link>
		<dc:creator>jfc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4242</guid>
		<description>Hi Sunshine,

Over the past few years eBay has been wanting to be more like Amazon so I think you have a point there. eBay will tend to favor big producers who they think provide a good buyer experience, whether it's power sellers or affiliates. It would be good to have some objective criteria we could use though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sunshine,</p>
<p>Over the past few years eBay has been wanting to be more like Amazon so I think you have a point there. eBay will tend to favor big producers who they think provide a good buyer experience, whether it&#8217;s power sellers or affiliates. It would be good to have some objective criteria we could use though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfc</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4241</link>
		<dc:creator>jfc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4241</guid>
		<description>Hi Splork,

It's not clear yet exactly how eBay will be grading ACRU's. A BANS site could get quality ACRU's with repeat customers. It's just unclear at this point exactly how eBay will be grading your sites. At least we'll have some lead time to figure it out since they won't start the pricing scheme until November on existing accounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Splork,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not clear yet exactly how eBay will be grading ACRU&#8217;s. A BANS site could get quality ACRU&#8217;s with repeat customers. It&#8217;s just unclear at this point exactly how eBay will be grading your sites. At least we&#8217;ll have some lead time to figure it out since they won&#8217;t start the pricing scheme until November on existing accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfc</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4240</link>
		<dc:creator>jfc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4240</guid>
		<description>Hi Discount Books,

The lower ACRU's are probably due somewhat to the time of year, which is traditionally slow on eBay, along with high gasoline prices and the uncertain economy. When I sold on eBay, the summer months were the worse time. Autumn, leading up to Christmas was usually very good and, after a short post-Christmas slump, things picked back up again until May/June.

eBay doesn't seem to count as many ACRU's as CJ did. They want to keep tight control on this since it was abused so much in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Discount Books,</p>
<p>The lower ACRU&#8217;s are probably due somewhat to the time of year, which is traditionally slow on eBay, along with high gasoline prices and the uncertain economy. When I sold on eBay, the summer months were the worse time. Autumn, leading up to Christmas was usually very good and, after a short post-Christmas slump, things picked back up again until May/June.</p>
<p>eBay doesn&#8217;t seem to count as many ACRU&#8217;s as CJ did. They want to keep tight control on this since it was abused so much in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunshine</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4235</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunshine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4235</guid>
		<description>I for one believe this is more a response to Amazon's recent earnings performance windfall and a quick way to tighten up their purse strings.

It's their business and they can very well do what they want, however, quality ratings based upon some unknown criteria is, well a little suspect.  Any honest traffic that I strategically  bring to their marketplace at my expense is of good quality whether they're repeat buyers or not.  Especially in today's market economy.  

If they want to change their ACRU payout then so be it.  They certainly don't need to base it on some half baked reason.  Just do like big Google and offer no reason at all for any changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one believe this is more a response to Amazon&#8217;s recent earnings performance windfall and a quick way to tighten up their purse strings.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s their business and they can very well do what they want, however, quality ratings based upon some unknown criteria is, well a little suspect.  Any honest traffic that I strategically  bring to their marketplace at my expense is of good quality whether they&#8217;re repeat buyers or not.  Especially in today&#8217;s market economy.  </p>
<p>If they want to change their ACRU payout then so be it.  They certainly don&#8217;t need to base it on some half baked reason.  Just do like big Google and offer no reason at all for any changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tips for Snowboarding</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4231</link>
		<dc:creator>Tips for Snowboarding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2008/08/01/epn-acru-changes-and-you/#comment-4231</guid>
		<description>Looking at this in a bigger picture, it just seems as though all the spam type activities are slowly but surely being weeded out. Seems every time someone comes up with a technique to game Adsense or eBay or whatever, that loophole eventually gets shut down. Seems to me that you may as well get used to simply building valid and authoritative sites with robust content. It you do, then none of these maneuverings by Adsense, etc. will mean anything. Believe me I've tried all kinds of methods to game the systems but they all keep getting slapped down. My latest attempt was the .info/BANS tactic that up to now has been a waste of time and money. Given that I see decent revenue from Storestacker sites bolted onto relevant blogs and static sites, I will probably disengage those BANS sites from the web. From what you say here it might hurt the revenue potential on those non-BANS sites.

splork</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at this in a bigger picture, it just seems as though all the spam type activities are slowly but surely being weeded out. Seems every time someone comes up with a technique to game Adsense or eBay or whatever, that loophole eventually gets shut down. Seems to me that you may as well get used to simply building valid and authoritative sites with robust content. It you do, then none of these maneuverings by Adsense, etc. will mean anything. Believe me I&#8217;ve tried all kinds of methods to game the systems but they all keep getting slapped down. My latest attempt was the .info/BANS tactic that up to now has been a waste of time and money. Given that I see decent revenue from Storestacker sites bolted onto relevant blogs and static sites, I will probably disengage those BANS sites from the web. From what you say here it might hurt the revenue potential on those non-BANS sites.</p>
<p>splork</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
