<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlogRush Sucks - Round 4</title>
	<link>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/</link>
	<description>Money Saving Reviews &#124; Money Saving Buying Guides</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jfc</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>jfc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-138</guid>
		<description>That's right. I've seen several posts around where the real rush of traffic came after they were 'inactivated' and blogged about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right. I&#8217;ve seen several posts around where the real rush of traffic came after they were &#8216;inactivated&#8217; and blogged about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn @ Coming to a Nursery Near You</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn @ Coming to a Nursery Near You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>you may be right, but no loss to me. I wound up getting more traffic because of being bounced than they ever brought me anyway LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you may be right, but no loss to me. I wound up getting more traffic because of being bounced than they ever brought me anyway LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfc</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>jfc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

Unfortunately 'Free' in a URL has become one of 'those things' on the Internet. Several affiliate programs these days won't allow you to participate if you have 'free' in your URL. I think marketing people overused it a lot around 2003-04. I don't think it will hurt your site too much though.

I'll put your blog on my list for a review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>Unfortunately &#8216;Free&#8217; in a URL has become one of &#8216;those things&#8217; on the Internet. Several affiliate programs these days won&#8217;t allow you to participate if you have &#8216;free&#8217; in your URL. I think marketing people overused it a lot around 2003-04. I don&#8217;t think it will hurt your site too much though.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll put your blog on my list for a review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David at free Christian resources</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>David at free Christian resources</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>I didn't notice the delay, I use the same thing to moderate first time comments too.

Yes the 'free' bit does make it sound spammy doesn't it!  If you know where to look the free things on the internet can be high quality.  It can just take a long time to find them sometimes - which was the idea behind my blog.

I think it was probably the free bit that helped get me more traffic than average.  I don't think any of them signed up for my RSS feed though so they were probably not the best "quality" of visitor.

I would love to have a free review if that is okay (shall I fill in the form or is this message okay?).  This blog looks interesting too, I was very surprised to see how new it is! I'm looking forward to seeing more posts on the various areas of blogging from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t notice the delay, I use the same thing to moderate first time comments too.</p>
<p>Yes the &#8216;free&#8217; bit does make it sound spammy doesn&#8217;t it!  If you know where to look the free things on the internet can be high quality.  It can just take a long time to find them sometimes - which was the idea behind my blog.</p>
<p>I think it was probably the free bit that helped get me more traffic than average.  I don&#8217;t think any of them signed up for my RSS feed though so they were probably not the best &#8220;quality&#8221; of visitor.</p>
<p>I would love to have a free review if that is okay (shall I fill in the form or is this message okay?).  This blog looks interesting too, I was very surprised to see how new it is! I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing more posts on the various areas of blogging from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfc</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>jfc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by David,

Akismet didn't like your link for some reason so I had to pull your comment out of their garbage bin. I guess since part of your site has marketing offer landing pages is why they flagged you.

Nice job putting together the list of articles though. It's always a good idea to provide something free that has real value as a lead in for an offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by David,</p>
<p>Akismet didn&#8217;t like your link for some reason so I had to pull your comment out of their garbage bin. I guess since part of your site has marketing offer landing pages is why they flagged you.</p>
<p>Nice job putting together the list of articles though. It&#8217;s always a good idea to provide something free that has real value as a lead in for an offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogRush New Headlines</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogRush New Headlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>I like your list of BlogRush headlines...

... And if you're looking for a minute-by-minute list of BlogRush opinions, you might be interested in my "BlogRush" mashup... headlines from all around the Internet about whether or not BlogRush is worth installing on your blog.

The opinions about John Reese and BlogRush might surprise you. 

Check it out at: &lt;a href='http://www.marketing-ideas.org/BlogRush-Opinions.php' rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.marketing-ideas.org/BlogRush-Opinions.php&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your list of BlogRush headlines&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; And if you&#8217;re looking for a minute-by-minute list of BlogRush opinions, you might be interested in my &#8220;BlogRush&#8221; mashup&#8230; headlines from all around the Internet about whether or not BlogRush is worth installing on your blog.</p>
<p>The opinions about John Reese and BlogRush might surprise you. </p>
<p>Check it out at: <a href='http://www.marketing-ideas.org/BlogRush-Opinions.php' rel="nofollow">http://www.marketing-ideas.org/BlogRush-Opinions.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfc</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>jfc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Hi Dawn,

I'd guess that you got rejected because of the sidebar widgets you're running. That shouldn't be a problem but it slows page loading and when a 'bot or trained monkey is trying to do their 2 second evaluation of your site they'll hit "REJECT" and move on before the page completely loads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dawn,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d guess that you got rejected because of the sidebar widgets you&#8217;re running. That shouldn&#8217;t be a problem but it slows page loading and when a &#8216;bot or trained monkey is trying to do their 2 second evaluation of your site they&#8217;ll hit &#8220;REJECT&#8221; and move on before the page completely loads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn @ Coming to a Nursery Near You</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn @ Coming to a Nursery Near You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Yeahhhhh, the whole idea that they had whomever they could even find rating blogs - really makes me realize just how much the hassle wasn't worth it in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeahhhhh, the whole idea that they had whomever they could even find rating blogs - really makes me realize just how much the hassle wasn&#8217;t worth it in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfc</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>jfc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

Sorry about the moderation delay but that's the way I avoid comment spammers.

I would guess the 'reviewers', human or bot, didn't read any further than the word 'FREE' in your URL before clicking the reject button. 

2% of your traffic is pretty good. On my accepted blog I got one click total after having it there about a month and that was it. 

I like your site. It's a different design from the usual Wordpress blogs and it is a great expression of your faith. Let me know if you would like for me to do a free review of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>Sorry about the moderation delay but that&#8217;s the way I avoid comment spammers.</p>
<p>I would guess the &#8216;reviewers&#8217;, human or bot, didn&#8217;t read any further than the word &#8216;FREE&#8217; in your URL before clicking the reject button. </p>
<p>2% of your traffic is pretty good. On my accepted blog I got one click total after having it there about a month and that was it. </p>
<p>I like your site. It&#8217;s a different design from the usual Wordpress blogs and it is a great expression of your faith. Let me know if you would like for me to do a free review of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David at free Christian resources</title>
		<link>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>David at free Christian resources</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://optempo.com/2007/10/23/blogrush-sucks-round-4/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Banned!

I love the way the reasons for being banned (sorry de-activated) is so broad there is no way you know why you were banned! 

http://www.blog.freechristianresources.org/

I wasn't doing too badly with blogrush either (compared to many)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Banned!</p>
<p>I love the way the reasons for being banned (sorry de-activated) is so broad there is no way you know why you were banned! </p>
<p><a href="http://www.blog.freechristianresources.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blog.freechristianresources.org/</a></p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t doing too badly with blogrush either (compared to many)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
